Finland’s sudden transition from a century of neutrality to full membership of NATO has changed the strategic landscape of northern Europe. But behind the headlines and political celebrations lies a much more complex and painful truth.
This video analyses why Finland’s decision – taken during the shock of the war in Ukraine – caused serious economic damage, social polarisation and the loss of its historic diplomatic role as a mediator between East and West.
We analyse how:
– NATO’s border was extended 1 300 km directly against Russia
– Finland was transformed from a balancing state into a frontline state
– Border towns collapsed as a result of a 60-70% collapse in tourism
– Finnair lost its strategic Asian hub advantage
– Industrial supply chains broke down after decades of reliance on Russia
– Society became divided as economic difficulties replaced optimism about security
Based on an in-depth political-economic analysis in the style of Jeffrey Sachs, this video asks a critical question: did Finland trade long-term stability for short-term security panic?
Watch the full analysis to understand the geopolitical, economic and social implications that will shape Finland’s future.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXw-jjDARuw