Finland’s sudden transition from a century of neutrality to full membership of NATO has changed the strategic landscape of northern Europe. But behind the headlines and political celebrations lies a much more complex and painful truth. This video analyses why Finland’s decision – taken during the shock of the war in Ukraine – caused serious economic damage, social polarisation and the loss of its historic diplomatic role as a mediator between East and West. We analyse how: – NATO’s border was extended 1 300 km directly against Russia – Finland was transformed from a balancing state into a frontline state – Border towns collapsed as a result of a 60-70% collapse in tourism – Finnair lost its strategic Asian hub advantage – Industrial supply chains broke down after decades of reliance on Russia – Society became divided as economic difficulties replaced optimism about security Based on an in-depth political-economic analysis in the style of Jeffrey Sachs, this video asks a critical question: did Finland trade long-term stability for short-term security panic? Watch the full analysis to understand the geopolitical, economic and social implications that will shape Finland’s future.
